On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Joerg Lehmann wrote:
Oh, it uses the rating, but please don't look at the code. Again, please don't look: it's ugly and probably doesn't do anything reasonable.
Don't worry, didn't look at it yet. The main problem with this is what people expect of it. I bet different people have different expected behaviors and matching that with parameters will be very hard.
I wonder if other projects succeeded in doing this and how that went. I'm thinking eg. of a slider that you can pull to favor good songs, and options to eg. make unrated songs default to 3 (1=worse, 2=bad, 3=normal, 4=good, 5=favorite).
Or what about using stars and o's. So you have:
4 **** favorite 4 3 *** best 3 2 ** good 2 1 * ok 1 0 normal (unrated) 0 shft-1 o doable -1 shft-2 oo bad -2 shft-3 ooo worse -3 shft-4 oooo hate it -4
This would give a much better rating system that can be misused.
Of course this had to be: cannot be misused.
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]